Marriage Is A Great Anti-Poverty Program

Marriage Is A Great Anti-Poverty Program

It’s National Marriage Week USA from now through the end of Wednesday (Valentine’s Day). The week is designed to promote the benefits of marriage – financial stability, better health, greater happiness and healthier kids. Other goals are to strengthen individual marriages, reduce the divorce rate and build a culture that fosters strong marriages.

Marriage is one of the most effective anti-poverty programs around. But far too often, government assistance programs for people with low incomes discourage marriage, because tying the knot reduces government welfare assistance payments.

For example, let’s say a couple is living together, unmarried, with their two children. Each partner has a low-wage job and a poverty-level income. The single mother and her two children get payments through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program run by the federal government and their state.

But if the mother marries the father, their combined income is just a bit too high to quality for government assistance – so they lose their monthly payment. To avoid that, the two don’t get married.

Abruptly ending assistance to couples when they marry is a shortsighted policy that acts as a powerful disincentive to marry. That’s bad for the couples, their children and our country. For example:

Research shows that children raised by both their parents in the home benefit greatly. They do better in school, are less likely to use illegal drugs, have fewer teen pregnancies and are less likely to get in trouble with the law.

Research shows that children raised by both their parents in the home benefit greatly. They do better in school, are less likely to use illegal drugs, have fewer teen pregnancies and are less likely to get in trouble with the law.

According to the Brookings Institution, the U.S. would have 25 percent less poverty today if we had the marriage rates we had in 1970 (79 percent of U.S. adults were married then, versus only 52 percent today). Cutting the poverty rate by a quarter would of course benefit individuals who escape poverty, and also benefit government and taxpayers by cutting the amount that needs to be spent on assistance to poor people.

And according to the Heritage Foundation, when parents are married the probability of a child living in poverty drops by an amazing amount – 82 percent.

On top of this, a 2008 report by the Institute for American Values estimated that taxpayers spent $112 billion a year for divorce and unwed childbearing. Adjusting that for inflation and the continued rise of both those family situations would make the cost substantially higher today.

A new Minnesota law enacted last year with bipartisan support and going into effect in August attempts to remove the marriage disincentive and could serve as a national model.

The Minnesota law increases the family income threshold to allow couples to continue receiving government benefits for one year following a new marriage, as long as family income is no higher than 275 percent of the federal poverty level.

The new law was proposed after clergy reported to Minnesota activists that single mothers who would like to get married were refraining because their husband-to-be would not earn enough to compensate for the mother’s loss of benefits. This new law gives the couples 12 months to come up with a plan to become financially stable without government assistance.

My aim as director of National Marriage Week USA is to strengthen marriages, and to get the word out that both the left and the right applaud marriage as a solution to poverty.

This effort is appealing to both progressives and conservatives, according to Minnesota activists Jason Adkins and Anne Kirsnik, who initiated the idea for the new law on benefits for married couples in that state. The bill passed in a Republican-majority state Legislature and was signed by a Democratic governor.

Adkins said that progressives like the new law because they want to give a leg up to those in poverty with hopes of moving them further toward financial sustainability. Conservatives also care about alleviating poverty and want to promote marriage.

There is no question that poverty and political acrimony are two significant issues that our country faces. As director of an annual campaign to strengthen marriage, I am encouraged that Minnesota officials from both political parties have addressed both with this law. It is my hope that other elected officials will follow in these footsteps and bridge the political divide to help American families.

By Sheila Weber | Fox News

Nigerian Online Newspaper=

follow us on twitter @aljazirahnewsng
Like us on Facebook @aljazirahnewsng

Share This:

Related Posts

6 kinds of relationships that might NEVER lead to marriage (... You know it’s of a truth that not every relationship one goes into would lead to marriage; most relationships would just fizzle out on the surface, why some would last for a while then comes to an end, with some even lasting a pretty long time but still won’t result to marriage. Most times, you mig...
‘If we focus on the family unit, our society will get better... In this interview, Julie Mogbo, a health practitioner and motivational speaker cum writer, speaks on her passion which spans tacklinging issues of marriage, societal ills, relationship and family life. Excerpts: Interview by Sheyi Thomas You are known more as a heath practitioner. What are the...
What Islam Say About Forced/Arranged/Love /Secret Marriages By Shaykh Muhammad Salim Ghisa Marriage is a sacred bond between a man and woman, which makes each other permissible for them to enjoy and live happily. Allah has described, in the most moving and eloquent terms, this eternal, natural relationship between man and woman, which is filled with...
Strange things Nigerians do in the name of marriage Sixty-two-year-old Adejoke Olawepo, a petty trader, almost died of shock as screams and claps went all around her. Commuting all the way from Oyingbo to Sango, Ogun State to see her daughter last Tuesday, she couldn’t understand why the train she was travelling in suddenly refused to mov...

Tags assigned to this article: